# Mistral vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

> Mistral and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.4 vs 28.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-vs-qwen2-5-7b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 5

## Summary

- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads 48.8 to 37.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MMLU-Pro: 27.7% for Mistral and 53.9% for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 28.6 |
| Rank | 297 | 314 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.17 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral: 33.2 (#249)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 35.9 (#204)

| Benchmark | Mistral | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1162 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.1% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mistral: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.5 (#117)

| Benchmark | Mistral | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |

## Reasoning

- Mistral: 21.3 (#199)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.3 (#317)

| Benchmark | Mistral | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1149 | — |
| DTBench | — | 47.7% |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.44 |

## Math

- Mistral: 20.5 (#275)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 11.8 (#300)

| Benchmark | Mistral | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 7.2% | 29.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1180 | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral: 16.3 (#283)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#281)

| Benchmark | Mistral | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 27.7% | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.3% | 34.1% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 35.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1125 | — |
| MMLU | — | 72.9% |

## Multilingual

- Mistral: 33.0 (#249)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Mistral | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1129 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1109 | — |
| LMArena French | 1179 | — |
| LMArena German | 1155 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1012 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1032 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1168 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1143 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral: 52.9 (#283)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.4 (#226)

| Benchmark | Mistral | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 56.8% | 74.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1152 | — |

## Long Context

- Mistral: 35.0 (#240)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Mistral | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1154 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral: 37.2 (#255)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#194)

| Benchmark | Mistral | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 66% | 73.1% |
| LMArena Text | 1165 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1158 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1147 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Mistral and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.4 vs 28.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Mistral or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 33.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.