# Mistral vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

> Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-vs-olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 61.5 to 52.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is IFEval: 56.8% for Mistral and 78% for Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 32.7 |
| Rank | 303 | 254 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral: 33.8 (#250)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

| Benchmark | Mistral | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1162 | 1210 |

## Reasoning

- Mistral: 22.2 (#200)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

| Benchmark | Mistral | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1149 | 1208 |

## Math

- Mistral: 22.3 (#278)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

| Benchmark | Mistral | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 7.2% | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1180 | 1208 |

## Knowledge

- Mistral: 16.6 (#288)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

| Benchmark | Mistral | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 27.7% | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.3% | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1125 | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral: 32.8 (#254)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

| Benchmark | Mistral | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1129 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1109 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1168 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1180 | — |
| LMArena German | 1155 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1013 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1032 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1143 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral: 52.6 (#288)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

| Benchmark | Mistral | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 56.8% | 78% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1152 | 1186 |

## Long Context

- Mistral: 35.0 (#245)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

| Benchmark | Mistral | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1153 | 1194 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral: 37.0 (#260)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

| Benchmark | Mistral | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1165 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1158 | 1199 |
| WildBench | 66% | 73.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1147 | 1221 |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mistral or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral has 22 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.