# Mistral Small vs Olmo 3 32b Think

> Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-small-vs-olmo-3-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small scores higher in 3 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 36.5 to 16.4.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Small | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 33.4 | 38.7 |
| Rank | 243 | 183 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Small: 34.0 (#247)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1362 | 1319 |
| SciCode | 26.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 36.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 36.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 46.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 497.62 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mistral Small: 28.1 (#93)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Small | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 37.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Small: 19.8 (#250)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1335 | 1302 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 44.8% | — |
| DTBench | 70.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 53.7% | — |
| LMCA | 20.6% | — |
| LiveBench | 44% | — |

## Math

- Mistral Small: 16.4 (#293)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1341 | 1316 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 5.8% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 39.9% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 46.8% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Small: 31.0 (#222)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1291 | 1273 |
| GPQA Diamond | 47.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | — |
| MMLU | 68.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Mistral Small: 33.5 (#96)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Small | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1142 | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Small: 45.5 (#169)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1315 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1340 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1337 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1340 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1324 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1275 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Small: 66.4 (#209)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1310 | 1275 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 63.7% | — |

## Long Context

- Mistral Small: 40.4 (#156)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1327 | 1296 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Small: 52.5 (#171)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1338 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1305 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1344 | 1290 |
| LiveBench Language | 30.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Small better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mistral Small or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Small and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small has 39 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.