# Mistral Small 3 vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-small-3-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small 3 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 25.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 6.7% for Mistral Small 3 and 86.7% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
- Both cost about the same: $0.05 input and $0.08 output per million tokens.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 33K.
- Mistral Small 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.9 | 39.5 |
| Rank | 268 | 152 |
| Context | 33K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.05 | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | $0.08 | $0.13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Mistral Small 3: 36.0 (#203)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1246 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 50.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Small 3: 18.2 (#269)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 23% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.06 | 144.62 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1233 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |

## Math

- Mistral Small 3: 15.3 (#290)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 6.7% | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1240 | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Small 3: 25.0 (#258)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.3% | 82.3% |
| Confabulations | 25.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1202 | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Small 3: 37.5 (#231)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1198 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1204 | — |
| LMArena French | 1202 | — |
| LMArena German | 1211 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1111 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1188 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1216 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Small 3: 63.9 (#224)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1214 | — |

## Long Context

- Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#206)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1246 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Small 3: 32.4 (#275)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1195 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 707 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1217 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Small 3 better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3 or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3 lists at $0.05 and $0.08.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3 and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.