# Mistral Small 3 vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B

> Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.9 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3 costs 13× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen2.5-Coder-32B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-small-3-vs-qwen2-5-coder-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small 3 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads 30.8 to 15.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 50.4% for Mistral Small 3 and 58% for Qwen2.5-Coder-32B.
- Mistral Small 3 is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.66 / $1 for Qwen2.5-Coder-32B.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.9 | 32.9 |
| Rank | 268 | 239 |
| Context | 33K | 33K |
| Input $/M | $0.05 | $0.66 |
| Output $/M | $0.08 | $1 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Small 3: 36.0 (#203)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.4 (#328)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.3% | 49% |
| LMArena Coding | 1246 | 1276 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 50.4% | 58% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 16.4% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 56.9% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 87.2% |
| MBPP+ | — | 77% |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Small 3: 18.2 (#269)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 20.4 (#220)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1233 | 1251 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.06 | 119.41 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 42.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 49.9% |
| HellaSwag | — | 83% |
| LiveBench | — | 46.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.8% |

## Math

- Mistral Small 3: 15.3 (#290)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 30.8 (#203)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1240 | 1251 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 6.7% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 46.6% |
| GSM8K | — | 93% |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Small 3: 25.0 (#258)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 32.9 (#200)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1202 | 1221 |
| GPQA Diamond | 47.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 25.2% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 70.5% |
| MMLU | — | 79.1% |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Small 3: 37.5 (#231)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#230)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1198 | 1205 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1204 | 1222 |
| LMArena Russian | 1216 | 1228 |
| LMArena French | 1202 | — |
| LMArena German | 1211 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1111 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1188 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Small 3: 63.9 (#224)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.6 (#240)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1214 | 1223 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.7% |

## Long Context

- Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#206)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.9 (#204)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1246 | 1251 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Small 3: 32.4 (#275)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1234 | 1230 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1195 | 1174 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1217 | 1222 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 707 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 23.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Small 3 better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.9 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3 costs 13× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen2.5-Coder-32B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3 or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Mistral Small 3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5-Coder-32B lists at $0.66 and $1.

### Is Mistral Small 3 or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?

Mistral Small 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 22.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 33K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3 and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.