# Mistral Small 3 vs Qwen-14B

> Mistral Small 3 and Qwen-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.9 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-small-3-vs-qwen-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small 3 scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen-14B in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen-14B leads 28.7 to 15.3.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.9 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 268 | 273 |
| Context | 33K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.05 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.08 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Small 3: 36.0 (#203)
- Qwen-14B: 30.6 (#283)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1246 | 1072 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.3% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 50.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Small 3: 18.2 (#269)
- Qwen-14B: 18.7 (#255)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1233 | 1027 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.06 | 112.8 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |

## Math

- Mistral Small 3: 15.3 (#290)
- Qwen-14B: 28.7 (#224)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1240 | 1068 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 6.7% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Small 3: 25.0 (#258)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 25.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1202 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Small 3: 37.5 (#231)
- Qwen-14B: 27.7 (#270)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1198 | 1042 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1204 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1202 | — |
| LMArena German | 1211 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1111 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1188 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1216 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Small 3: 63.9 (#224)
- Qwen-14B: 52.6 (#284)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1214 | 1031 |

## Long Context

- Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#206)
- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1246 | 1029 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Small 3: 32.4 (#275)
- Qwen-14B: 27.8 (#294)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1234 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1195 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1217 | 1022 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 707 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Small 3 better than Qwen-14B?

Mistral Small 3 and Qwen-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.9 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Mistral Small 3 or Qwen-14B better for coding?

Mistral Small 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3 and Qwen-14B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.