# Mistral Small 3 vs Olmo 3 32b Think

> Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-small-3-vs-olmo-3-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small 3 scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 36.5 to 16.3.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Small 3 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 31.2 | 38.7 |
| Rank | 278 | 183 |
| Context | 33K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.05 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.08 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Small 3: 36.5 (#207)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1246 | 1319 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.3% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 50.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Small 3: 18.9 (#273)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1233 | 1302 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.07 | — |

## Math

- Mistral Small 3: 16.3 (#295)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1240 | 1316 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 6.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Small 3: 25.1 (#263)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1202 | 1273 |
| GPQA Diamond | 47.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 25.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Small 3: 37.3 (#236)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1198 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1204 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1203 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1211 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1216 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1111 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1188 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Small 3: 63.7 (#229)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1214 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#211)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1246 | 1296 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Small 3: 32.2 (#280)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1234 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1195 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1217 | 1290 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 707 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Small 3 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mistral Small 3 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 36.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.