# Mistral Small 3.2 vs Qwen3 Coder Next

> Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.2 costs 2.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 Coder Next's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-small-3-2-vs-qwen3-coder-next
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 22.4 to 18.1.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper at $0.0938 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.12 / $0.80 for Qwen3 Coder Next.
- Qwen3 Coder Next accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.2 | 34.3 |
| Rank | 280 | 232 |
| Context | 256K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.0938 | $0.12 |
| Output $/M | $0.25 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Small 3.2: —
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.4% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.74 | — |

## Math

- Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 30.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 49.1% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1255 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Small 3.2 better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.2 costs 2.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 Coder Next's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.2 or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0938 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Next lists at $0.12 and $0.80.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 Coder Next does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.2 and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.2 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.