# Mistral Small 3.2 vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-small-3-2-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small 3.2 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 26.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 30.3% for Mistral Small 3.2 and 86.7% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.0938 / $0.25 for Mistral Small 3.2.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 256K.
- Mistral Small 3.2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 39.5 |
| Rank | 271 | 152 |
| Context | 256K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.0938 | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | $0.25 | $0.13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Small 3.2: 17.5 (#282)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 1% | 23% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | 144.62 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |

## Math

- Mistral Small 3.2: 24.9 (#251)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 30.3% | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Small 3.2: 26.8 (#249)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 49.1% | 82.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Small 3.2: 45.1 (#219)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1255 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Small 3.2 better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.2 or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3.2 lists at $0.0938 and $0.25.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.2 and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.2 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.