# Mistral Small 3.2 vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

> Mistral Small 3.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-small-3-2-vs-qwen2-5-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small 3.2 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Mistral Small 3.2 leads 24.9 to 15.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 30.3% for Mistral Small 3.2 and 7.4% for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper at $0.0938 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $2.80 for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.
- Mistral Small 3.2 accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 271 | 291 |
| Context | 256K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.0938 | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | $0.25 | $2.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Small 3.2: —
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.1 (#165)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Small 3.2: 17.5 (#282)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 18.5 (#262)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 1% | 0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | 128.52 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.4% | — |

## Math

- Mistral Small 3.2: 24.9 (#251)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 15.3 (#289)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 30.3% | 7.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Small 3.2: 26.8 (#249)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#259)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 49.1% | 46.1% |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Small 3.2: 45.1 (#219)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1255 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Small 3.2 better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Mistral Small 3.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.2 or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0938 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 32B Instruct lists at $0.70 and $2.80.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Small 3.2 does, with 256K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.2 and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.2 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.