# Mistral Small 3.2 vs Qwen1.5-32B

> Mistral Small 3.2 and Qwen1.5-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.2 vs 30.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-small-3-2-vs-qwen1-5-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Mistral Small 3.2 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Mistral Small 3.2 leads 26.7 to 13.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 49.1% for Mistral Small 3.2 and 30.7% for Qwen1.5-32B.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.2 | 30.5 |
| Rank | 280 | 293 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.0938 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.25 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Small 3.2: —
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1155 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1130 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.74 | — |

## Math

- Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 30.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1155 |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 49.1% | 30.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1126 |
| MMLU | — | 74.4% |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Small 3.2: —
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1177 |
| LMArena French | — | 1101 |
| LMArena German | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1008 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1073 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1089 |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Small 3.2: —
- Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1116 |

## Long Context

- Mistral Small 3.2: —
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1146 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1083 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1255 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1140 |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Small 3.2 better than Qwen1.5-32B?

Mistral Small 3.2 and Qwen1.5-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.2 vs 30.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.2 and Qwen1.5-32B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.2 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.