# Mistral Small 3.2 vs Qwen Plus

> Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.2 costs 4.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-small-3-2-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small 3.2 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen Plus in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen Plus leads 27.6 to 17.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 40.4% for Mistral Small 3.2 and 63.3% for Qwen Plus.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper at $0.0938 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.20 for Qwen Plus.
- Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 256K.
- Mistral Small 3.2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 36.7 |
| Rank | 271 | 204 |
| Context | 256K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.0938 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $0.25 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Mistral Small 3.2: —
- Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1328 |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Small 3.2: 17.5 (#282)
- Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.4% | 63.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1317 |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | — |

## Math

- Mistral Small 3.2: 24.9 (#251)
- Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 30.3% | 17.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1326 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Small 3.2: 26.8 (#249)
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 49.1% | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1328 |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Small 3.2: —
- Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1323 |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Small 3.2: —
- Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1303 |

## Long Context

- Mistral Small 3.2: —
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1325 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Small 3.2: 45.1 (#219)
- Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1293 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1255 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1336 |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Small 3.2 better than Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.2 costs 4.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.2 or Qwen Plus?

Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0938 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Qwen Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.20.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.2 and Qwen Plus share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.2 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.