# Mistral Small 3.2 vs Qwen-14B

> Mistral Small 3.2 and Qwen-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-small-3-2-vs-qwen-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Mistral Small 3.2 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen-14B in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Small 3.2 leads 45.1 to 27.8.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 271 | 273 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.0938 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.25 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Small 3.2: —
- Qwen-14B: 30.6 (#283)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1072 |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Small 3.2: 17.5 (#282)
- Qwen-14B: 18.7 (#255)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | 112.8 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1027 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |

## Math

- Mistral Small 3.2: 24.9 (#251)
- Qwen-14B: 28.7 (#224)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 30.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1068 |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Small 3.2: 26.8 (#249)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 49.1% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Small 3.2: —
- Qwen-14B: 27.7 (#270)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1077 |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Small 3.2: —
- Qwen-14B: 52.6 (#284)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1031 |

## Long Context

- Mistral Small 3.2: —
- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1029 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Small 3.2: 45.1 (#219)
- Qwen-14B: 27.8 (#294)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1028 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1255 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1022 |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Small 3.2 better than Qwen-14B?

Mistral Small 3.2 and Qwen-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.2 and Qwen-14B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.2 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.