# Mistral Small 3.1 vs Qwen3 Coder Next

> Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-small-3-1-vs-qwen3-coder-next
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.35 / $0.56 for Mistral Small 3.1.
- Qwen3 Coder Next accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.7 | 34.3 |
| Rank | 269 | 232 |
| Context | 128K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.35 | $0.12 |
| Output $/M | $0.56 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Small 3.1: 38.3 (#179)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1309 | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Small 3.1: 19.7 (#254)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1278 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.48 | — |

## Math

- Mistral Small 3.1: 14.7 (#301)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 3.9% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 24.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1262 | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#271)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41.9% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 61% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1257 | — |

## Multimodal

- Mistral Small 3.1: 33.2 (#99)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1136 | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Small 3.1: 41.2 (#209)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1255 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1253 | — |
| LMArena French | 1273 | — |
| LMArena German | 1266 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1208 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1206 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1263 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1283 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Small 3.1: 63.6 (#230)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 75% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1264 | — |

## Long Context

- Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#178)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1299 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Small 3.1: 37.0 (#259)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1277 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1253 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 761 | — |
| WildBench | 78.8% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1270 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Small 3.1 better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.1 or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3.1 lists at $0.35 and $0.56.

### Is Mistral Small 3.1 or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

Mistral Small 3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 Coder Next does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.1 and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.1 has 28 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.