# Mistral Small 3.1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.1 costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-small-3-1-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 22

## Summary

- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small 3.1 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 49.3 to 13.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 3.9% for Mistral Small 3.1 and 93.3% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Mistral Small 3.1 is cheaper at $0.35 / $0.56 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.60 for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Qwen3.7 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- Mistral Small 3.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 45.0 |
| Rank | 263 | 66 |
| Context | 128K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.35 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $0.56 | $1.60 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Mistral Small 3.1: 37.7 (#175)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.1 (#200)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1309 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mistral Small 3.1: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.2 (#130)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Small 3.1: 18.9 (#249)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 38.4 (#54)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 1% | 24% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1278 | 1460 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.48 | 147.39 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |

## Math

- Mistral Small 3.1: 13.7 (#295)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 49.3 (#47)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 3.9% | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1261 | 1467 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| Omni-MATH | 24.8% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#266)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#46)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41.9% | 87.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1258 | 1467 |
| MMLU-Pro | 61% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Mistral Small 3.1: 32.6 (#93)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.2 (#30)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1136 | 1281 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Small 3.1: 41.4 (#204)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 55.0 (#36)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1255 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1254 | 1510 |
| LMArena French | 1270 | 1471 |
| LMArena German | 1266 | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1210 | 1411 |
| LMArena Korean | 1206 | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | 1263 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1283 | 1453 |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Small 3.1: 63.8 (#225)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.9 (#49)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1264 | 1439 |
| IFEval | 75% | — |

## Long Context

- Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#172)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#61)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1300 | 1454 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Small 3.1: 37.2 (#254)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.5 (#54)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1278 | 1454 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1253 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1270 | 1459 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 761 | — |
| WildBench | 78.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Small 3.1 better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.1 costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Mistral Small 3.1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.35 per million input tokens and $0.56 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.60.

### Is Mistral Small 3.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Mistral Small 3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.1 has 28 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.