# Mistral Small 3.1 vs Qwen1.5-72B

> Mistral Small 3.1 and Qwen1.5-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.7 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-small-3-1-vs-qwen1-5-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small 3.1 scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen1.5-72B leads 33.2 to 14.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 41.9% for Mistral Small 3.1 and 28.8% for Qwen1.5-72B.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.7 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 269 | 285 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.35 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.56 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Small 3.1: 38.3 (#179)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1309 | 1165 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.6% |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Small 3.1: 19.7 (#254)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1278 | 1148 |
| Chess Puzzles | 1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.48 | — |

## Math

- Mistral Small 3.1: 14.7 (#301)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1262 | 1164 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 3.9% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 24.8% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#271)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41.9% | 28.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1257 | 1136 |
| MMLU-Pro | 61% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Mistral Small 3.1: 33.2 (#99)
- Qwen1.5-72B: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1136 | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Small 3.1: 41.2 (#209)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1255 | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1253 | 1186 |
| LMArena French | 1273 | 1159 |
| LMArena German | 1266 | 1084 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1208 | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | 1206 | 1050 |
| LMArena Russian | 1263 | 1104 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1283 | 1110 |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Small 3.1: 63.6 (#230)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1264 | 1141 |
| IFEval | 75% | — |

## Long Context

- Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#178)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1299 | 1157 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Small 3.1: 37.0 (#259)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1277 | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1253 | 1137 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1270 | 1160 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 761 | — |
| WildBench | 78.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Small 3.1 better than Qwen1.5-72B?

Mistral Small 3.1 and Qwen1.5-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.7 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Mistral Small 3.1 or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?

Mistral Small 3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.1 and Qwen1.5-72B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.1 has 28 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.