# Mistral Small 3.1 vs Qwen-14B

> Mistral Small 3.1 and Qwen-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.7 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-small-3-1-vs-qwen-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small 3.1 scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen-14B in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen-14B leads 31.2 to 14.7.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.7 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 269 | 275 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.35 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.56 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Small 3.1: 38.3 (#179)
- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1309 | 1071 |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Small 3.1: 19.7 (#254)
- Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1278 | 1027 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.48 | 113.03 |
| Chess Puzzles | 1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |

## Math

- Mistral Small 3.1: 14.7 (#301)
- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1262 | 1068 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 3.9% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 24.8% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#271)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41.9% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 61% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1257 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |

## Multimodal

- Mistral Small 3.1: 33.2 (#99)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1136 | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Small 3.1: 41.2 (#209)
- Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1255 | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1253 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1273 | — |
| LMArena German | 1266 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1208 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1206 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1263 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1283 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Small 3.1: 63.6 (#230)
- Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1264 | 1031 |
| IFEval | 75% | — |

## Long Context

- Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#178)
- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1299 | 1028 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Small 3.1: 37.0 (#259)
- Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1277 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1253 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1270 | 1022 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 761 | — |
| WildBench | 78.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Small 3.1 better than Qwen-14B?

Mistral Small 3.1 and Qwen-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.7 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Mistral Small 3.1 or Qwen-14B better for coding?

Mistral Small 3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.1 and Qwen-14B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.1 has 28 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.