# Mistral Small 3.1 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-small-3-1-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small 3.1 scores higher in 3 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 36.3 to 14.7.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Small 3.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 31.7 | 37.9 |
| Rank | 269 | 191 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.35 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.56 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Small 3.1: 38.3 (#179)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1309 | 1291 |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Small 3.1: 19.7 (#254)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1278 | 1272 |
| Chess Puzzles | 1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.48 | — |

## Math

- Mistral Small 3.1: 14.7 (#301)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1262 | 1305 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 3.9% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 24.8% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#271)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1257 | 1295 |
| GPQA Diamond | 41.9% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 61% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Mistral Small 3.1: 33.2 (#99)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1136 | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Small 3.1: 41.2 (#209)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1255 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1253 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | 1273 | 1260 |
| LMArena German | 1266 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 1263 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1283 | 1289 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1208 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1206 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Small 3.1: 63.6 (#230)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1264 | 1247 |
| IFEval | 75% | — |

## Long Context

- Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#178)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1299 | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Small 3.1: 37.0 (#259)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)

| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1277 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1253 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1270 | 1252 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 761 | — |
| WildBench | 78.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Small 3.1 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mistral Small 3.1 or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (38.3 vs 37.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.1 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.1 has 28 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.