# Mistral Nemo vs Step 3.5 Flash

> Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-nemo-vs-step-3-5-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 3.5 Flash leads 59.0 to 28.6.
- Both cost about the same: $0.15 input and $0.15 output per million tokens.
- Step 3.5 Flash accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Nemo | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 41.7 |
| Rank | 332 | 116 |
| Context | 128K | 256K |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | $0.15 | $0.30 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Step 3.5 Flash: 41.7 (#106)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1436 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118)
- Step 3.5 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 21.2 (#202)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 28.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1411 |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.63 | — |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |

## Math

- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 40.6 (#77)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 66.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1408 |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 39.0 (#127)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1422 |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Step 3.5 Flash: 50.7 (#115)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1386 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1448 |
| LMArena French | — | 1421 |
| LMArena German | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1353 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1385 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1419 |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Step 3.5 Flash: 73.3 (#119)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1385 |

## Long Context

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#112)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1402 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 59.0 (#108)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1403 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1357 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1405 |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Nemo better than Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or Step 3.5 Flash?

Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Step 3.5 Flash lists at $0.10 and $0.30.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Step 3.5 Flash does, with 256K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Step 3.5 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.