# Mistral Nemo vs Solar Pro4

> Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 3.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Solar Pro4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-nemo-vs-solar-pro4
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Solar Pro4 leads 56.5 to 28.5.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for Solar Pro4.
- Solar Pro4 accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 128K.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Nemo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 26.4 | 42.1 |
| Rank | 337 | 121 |
| Context | 128K | 524K |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $0.15 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1437 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)
- Solar Pro4: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)
- Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1399 |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.68 | — |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |

## Math

- Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)
- Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1416 |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)
- Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1427 |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1415 |
| LMArena French | — | 1397 |
| LMArena German | — | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1401 |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1377 |

## Long Context

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1381 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)
- Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1316 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1385 |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Nemo better than Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 3.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Solar Pro4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or Solar Pro4?

Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Solar Pro4 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Solar Pro4 does, with 524K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Solar Pro4 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.