# Mistral Nemo vs Qwen3 Coder Next

> Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 1.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 Coder Next's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-nemo-vs-qwen3-coder-next
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.12 / $0.80 for Qwen3 Coder Next.
- Qwen3 Coder Next accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 26.4 | 34.3 |
| Rank | 337 | 232 |
| Context | 128K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.12 |
| Output $/M | $0.15 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.68 | — |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |

## Math

- Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Nemo better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 1.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 Coder Next's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Next lists at $0.12 and $0.80.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 Coder Next does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.