# Mistral Nemo vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 4.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-nemo-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Nemo scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 12.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 29.9% for Mistral Nemo and 87.9% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.60 for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Qwen3.7 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 26.4 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 337 | 72 |
| Context | 128K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $0.15 | $1.60 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1473 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 48.6% | 84% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.68 | 147.37 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1460 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |

## Math

- Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1466 |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | 87.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1467 |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |

## Multimodal

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1510 |
| LMArena French | — | 1473 |
| LMArena German | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1440 |

## Long Context

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1455 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1439 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1460 |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Nemo better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 4.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.60.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.