# Mistral Nemo vs Qwen3.7 Max

> Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 25× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-nemo-vs-qwen3-7-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Nemo scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Max in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 61.6 to 12.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 29.9% for Mistral Nemo and 90.9% for Qwen3.7 Max.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3.7 Max.
- Qwen3.7 Max accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 26.4 | 51.5 |
| Rank | 337 | 42 |
| Context | 128K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $2.50 |
| Output $/M | $0.15 | $7.50 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 77.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1515 |
| SciCode | — | 48.8% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1498 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,189 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |
| GBAEval | — | 0.4% |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 48.6% | 92.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.68 | 153.68 |
| SimpleBench | — | 70.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 85.1% |
| CritPt | — | 13.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 19% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 9.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1483 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 32% |
| LMCA | — | 44% |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |

## Math

- Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 26% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1490 |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | 90.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 55.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1488 |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1530 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1484 |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1460 |

## Long Context

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1482 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1449 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1110 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1481 |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Nemo better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 25× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or Qwen3.7 Max?

Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max lists at $2.50 and $7.50.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Max does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Qwen3.7 Max share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.