# Mistral Nemo vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-nemo-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Nemo scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 12.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 29.9% for Mistral Nemo and 82.3% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.15 for Mistral Nemo.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 39.5 |
| Rank | 332 | 152 |
| Context | 128K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | $0.15 | $0.13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.63 | 144.62 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |

## Math

- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | 82.3% |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Nemo better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Mistral Nemo lists at $0.15 and $0.15.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.