# Mistral Nemo vs Qwen3 32B

> Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 8.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 32B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-nemo-vs-qwen3-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Nemo scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 32B in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 32B leads 40.0 to 12.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 29.9% for Mistral Nemo and 65.7% for Qwen3 32B.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $2.80 for Qwen3 32B.
- Qwen3 32B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 332 | 166 |
| Context | 128K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | $0.15 | $2.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen3 32B: 37.3 (#184)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 40% |
| SciCode | — | 35.4% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1358 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118)
- Qwen3 32B: 32.3 (#58)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | 48.7% |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230)
- Qwen3 32B: 19.6 (#233)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 48.6% | 67.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.63 | 138.51 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1335 |
| LMCA | — | 17.3% |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |

## Math

- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.9 (#89)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.9% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1399 |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293)
- Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#112)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | 65.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1362 |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen3 32B: 45.8 (#162)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1317 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1357 |
| LMArena German | — | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1311 |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen3 32B: 69.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1305 |

## Long Context

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen3 32B: 43.7 (#83)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 74.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1327 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291)
- Qwen3 32B: 53.1 (#158)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1297 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1331 |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Nemo better than Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 8.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 32B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or Qwen3 32B?

Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Qwen3 32B lists at $0.70 and $2.80.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 32B does, with 131K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Qwen3 32B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.