# Mistral Nemo vs Qwen2-72B

> Qwen2-72B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.5 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-nemo-vs-qwen2-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Nemo scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2-72B in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2-72B leads 41.0 to 28.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 10.8% for Mistral Nemo and 39.1% for Qwen2-72B.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 29.5 |
| Rank | 332 | 294 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen2-72B: 28.7 (#303)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1196 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118)
- Qwen2-72B: 16.9 (#138)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230)
- Qwen2-72B: 22.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.63 | 125.27 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1191 |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |

## Math

- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263)
- Qwen2-72B: 27.9 (#232)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | 39.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1235 |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293)
- Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#270)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | 40.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1171 |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |
| MMLU | — | 82.4% |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen2-72B: 36.0 (#239)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1240 |
| LMArena French | — | 1169 |
| LMArena German | — | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1169 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1168 |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen2-72B: 62.0 (#236)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1181 |

## Long Context

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#230)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1193 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291)
- Qwen2-72B: 41.0 (#236)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1181 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1195 |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Nemo better than Qwen2-72B?

Qwen2-72B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.5 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Qwen2-72B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.