# Mistral Nemo vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct

> Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.9 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 28× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-nemo-vs-qwen2-5-vl-72b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Mistral Nemo leads 23.5 to 18.6.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $2.80 / $8.40 for Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct.
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 26.4 | 29.9 |
| Rank | 337 | 302 |
| Context | 128K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $2.80 |
| Output $/M | $0.15 | $8.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.6 (#144)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| OSWorld | — | 5% |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.7 (#233)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36% |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.68 | — |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |

## Math

- Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |

## Multimodal

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 33.5 (#97)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1107 |
| Video-MME | — | 73.5% |
| GeoBench | — | 62% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 33.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Nemo better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?

Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.9 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 28× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?

Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct lists at $2.80 and $8.40.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct does, with 131K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.