# Mistral Nemo vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-nemo-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 34.9 to 12.3.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 332 | 179 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1314 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1299 |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.63 | — |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |

## Math

- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1298 |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1289 |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1314 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1271 |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1292 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1262 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1299 |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Nemo better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.