# Mistral Nemo vs Qwen1.5-72B

> Qwen1.5-72B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.3 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-nemo-vs-qwen1-5-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Mistral Nemo scores higher in 1 category and Qwen1.5-72B in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen1.5-72B leads 37.4 to 28.6.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 30.3 |
| Rank | 332 | 282 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen1.5-72B: 31.4 (#272)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1166 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.6% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118)
- Qwen1.5-72B: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 21.2 (#201)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1148 |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.63 | — |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |

## Math

- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 30.7 (#205)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1164 |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#295)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | 28.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1136 |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen1.5-72B: 33.4 (#248)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1186 |
| LMArena French | — | 1158 |
| LMArena German | — | 1084 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1049 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1104 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1110 |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen1.5-72B: 59.6 (#251)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1142 |

## Long Context

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen1.5-72B: 35.0 (#238)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1157 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 37.4 (#253)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1137 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1160 |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Nemo better than Qwen1.5-72B?

Qwen1.5-72B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.3 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Qwen1.5-72B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.