# Mistral Nemo vs Qwen1.5-32B

> Qwen1.5-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.5 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-nemo-vs-qwen1-5-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Mistral Nemo scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen1.5-32B leads 33.0 to 25.5.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 26.4 | 30.5 |
| Rank | 337 | 293 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1155 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)
- Qwen1.5-32B: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1130 |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.68 | — |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |

## Math

- Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1155 |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | 30.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1126 |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |
| MMLU | — | 74.4% |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1177 |
| LMArena French | — | 1101 |
| LMArena German | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1008 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1073 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1089 |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1116 |

## Long Context

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1146 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1083 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1140 |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Nemo better than Qwen1.5-32B?

Qwen1.5-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.5 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Qwen1.5-32B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.