# Mistral Nemo vs Qwen Max

> Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.4 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 19× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-nemo-vs-qwen-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Nemo scores higher in 1 category and Qwen Max in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen Max leads 48.0 to 28.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 10.8% for Mistral Nemo and 67.2% for Qwen Max.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $1.60 / $6.40 for Qwen Max.
- Mistral Nemo accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 33K.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Nemo | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 34.4 |
| Rank | 332 | 226 |
| Context | 128K | 33K |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $1.60 |
| Output $/M | $0.15 | $6.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#288)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1288 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118)
- Qwen Max: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230)
- Qwen Max: 24.1 (#154)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1270 |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.63 | — |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |

## Math

- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263)
- Qwen Max: 21.0 (#272)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | 67.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1275 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#222)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen Max: 42.0 (#197)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1254 |
| LMArena French | — | 1329 |
| LMArena German | — | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1290 |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen Max: 66.7 (#203)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1262 |

## Long Context

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#175)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1289 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291)
- Qwen Max: 48.0 (#200)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1248 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1277 |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Nemo better than Qwen Max?

Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.4 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 19× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or Qwen Max?

Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Qwen Max lists at $1.60 and $6.40.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Nemo does, with 128K tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Qwen Max share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.