# Mistral Nemo vs Olmo 3 32b Think

> Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-nemo-vs-olmo-3-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 35.0 to 12.3.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 26.4 | 38.7 |
| Rank | 337 | 183 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1319 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1302 |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.68 | — |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |

## Math

- Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1316 |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1273 |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1254 |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1296 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1256 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1290 |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Nemo better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.