# Mistral Nemo vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

> Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-nemo-vs-olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 42.3 to 28.6.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 32.2 |
| Rank | 332 | 248 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1210 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1208 |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.63 | — |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |

## Math

- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1208 |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1187 |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 78% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1186 |

## Long Context

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1194 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1199 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1221 |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Nemo better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.