# Mistral Nemo vs Muse Spark 1.1

> Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 13× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-nemo-vs-muse-spark-1-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Nemo scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 73.6 to 28.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 48.6% for Mistral Nemo and 94.4% for Muse Spark 1.1.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.1.
- Muse Spark 1.1 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Nemo | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 49.9 |
| Rank | 332 | 43 |
| Context | 128K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | $0.15 | $4.25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Muse Spark 1.1: 50.8 (#38)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 53.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1542 |
| SciCode | — | 58.8% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1497 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 33.9 (#45)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 40.5% |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |
| GBAEval | — | 7.9% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 15% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,520 |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 45.9 (#41)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 48.6% | 94.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.63 | 154.32 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 84.9% |
| CritPt | — | 15.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1486 |
| LMCA | — | 49.9% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 52.5% |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |

## Math

- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 44.0 (#67)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 39% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1477 |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 52.8 (#55)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 57.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1480 |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |

## Multimodal

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Muse Spark 1.1: 41.9 (#28)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1292 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1465 |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Muse Spark 1.1: 56.8 (#16)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1518 |
| LMArena French | — | 1494 |
| LMArena German | — | 1466 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1445 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1459 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1482 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1471 |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Muse Spark 1.1: 76.8 (#36)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1457 |

## Long Context

- Mistral Nemo: —
- Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#55)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1463 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 73.6 (#11)

| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | 1927 |
| LMArena Text | — | 1479 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1440 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1260 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1484 |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Nemo better than Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 13× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or Muse Spark 1.1?

Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.1 does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Muse Spark 1.1 share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 36.