# Mistral Medium vs Qwen1.5-7B

> Mistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-medium-vs-qwen1-5-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Medium scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen1.5-7B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium leads 60.0 to 29.6.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Medium | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.3 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 218 | 273 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $1.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $7.50 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Medium: 34.2 (#243)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1434 | 1107 |
| FrontierCode | 8% | — |
| SciCode | 40.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 43.7% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 763.98 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mistral Medium: 28.3 (#90)
- Qwen1.5-7B: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 37.7% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Medium: 24.0 (#167)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1426 | 1065 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 50% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 75.5% | — |
| LMCA | 26.1% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 26.9% | — |

## Math

- Mistral Medium: 28.1 (#245)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1408 | 1080 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 32.2% | — |
| ProofBench | 9% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 81.6% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Medium: 25.0 (#265)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1408 | 1055 |
| GPQA Diamond | 59.5% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 22.7% | — |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |

## Multimodal

- Mistral Medium: 35.3 (#88)
- Qwen1.5-7B: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1172 | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Medium: 52.1 (#91)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1408 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1447 | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | 1411 | 1006 |
| LMArena French | 1459 | — |
| LMArena German | 1432 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1378 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1380 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1433 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Medium: 73.7 (#116)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1398 | 1058 |

## Long Context

- Mistral Medium: 42.9 (#114)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1406 | 1090 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Medium: 60.0 (#103)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1424 | 1083 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1035 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1418 | 1062 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 77.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Medium better than Qwen1.5-7B?

Mistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mistral Medium or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?

Mistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.2 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium and Qwen1.5-7B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium has 36 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.