# Mistral Medium vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 36.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-medium-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Medium scores higher in 4 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Mistral Medium leads 52.3 to 38.3.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Medium | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 36.0 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 211 | 191 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $1.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $7.50 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Medium: 33.8 (#241)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.1 (#186)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1434 | 1292 |
| FrontierCode | 8% | — |
| SciCode | 40.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 43.7% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 763.98 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mistral Medium: 28.1 (#84)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 37.7% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Medium: 23.3 (#165)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 24.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1426 | 1272 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 50% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 75.5% | — |
| LMCA | 26.1% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 26.9% | — |

## Math

- Mistral Medium: 27.2 (#238)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 33.6 (#170)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1409 | 1305 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 32.2% | — |
| ProofBench | 9% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 81.6% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Medium: 24.9 (#260)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.0 (#178)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1408 | 1294 |
| GPQA Diamond | 59.5% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 22.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Mistral Medium: 34.6 (#82)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1172 | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Medium: 52.3 (#86)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.3 (#226)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1408 | 1210 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1448 | 1241 |
| LMArena French | 1460 | 1262 |
| LMArena German | 1433 | 1260 |
| LMArena Russian | 1411 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1433 | 1288 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1378 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1382 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Medium: 73.9 (#111)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.8 (#213)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1398 | 1246 |

## Long Context

- Mistral Medium: 42.9 (#108)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#190)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1406 | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Medium: 60.2 (#97)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.4 (#215)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1424 | 1271 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1418 | 1252 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 77.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Medium better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 36.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mistral Medium or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium has 36 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.