# Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen3 Coder Next

> Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 10× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Medium 3.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-medium-3-5-vs-qwen3-coder-next
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 22.4 to 17.3.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.2 | 34.3 |
| Rank | 152 | 232 |
| Context | 262K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $1.50 | $0.12 |
| Output $/M | $7.50 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1264 | — |
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1461 | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 41.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 12.9% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1436 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.35 | — |

## Math

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1431 | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1432 | — |

## Multimodal

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1223 | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1442 | — |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1451 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1385 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1409 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1415 | — |

## Long Context

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1374 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 993 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1423 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Medium 3.5 better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 10× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Medium 3.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.5 lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

### Is Mistral Medium 3.5 or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (36.0 vs 36.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.