# Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen3.6 27B

> Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 40.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-medium-3-5-vs-qwen3-6-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.6 27B in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 27B leads 52.4 to 40.0.
- Qwen3.6 27B is cheaper at $0.60 / $3.60 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.2 | 42.2 |
| Rank | 152 | 117 |
| Context | 262K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $1.50 | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | $7.50 | $3.60 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 39.1 (#163)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1264 | — |
| SciCode | — | 37.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1461 | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 25.0 (#153)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.35 | 146.5 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 41.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 12.9% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1436 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| DTBench | — | 78.1% |
| LMCA | — | 34.5% |

## Math

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 48.5 (#62)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 35.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 91.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1431 | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#63)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 85.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1432 | — |

## Multimodal

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1223 | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1442 | — |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1451 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1385 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1409 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1415 | — |

## Long Context

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#181)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench 4 | 993 | 1026 |
| LMArena Text | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1374 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1423 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Medium 3.5 better than Qwen3.6 27B?

Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 40.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Qwen3.6 27B?

Qwen3.6 27B is cheaper. It lists at $0.60 per million input tokens and $3.60 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.5 lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

### Is Mistral Medium 3.5 or Qwen3.6 27B better for coding?

Qwen3.6 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3.6 27B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 27B has 11.