# Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-medium-3-5-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 52.1 to 42.1.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 151 | 179 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $1.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $7.50 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 35.7 (#208)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1461 | 1314 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1263 | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 16.6 (#290)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1436 | 1299 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 41.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 12.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.42 | — |

## Math

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.4 (#113)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1432 | 1298 |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.3 (#123)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1431 | 1289 |

## Multimodal

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 37.6 (#64)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1222 | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 52.1 (#93)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1405 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1443 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1453 | 1231 |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Korean | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1406 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.7 (#87)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#101)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1414 | 1292 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.6 (#113)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1421 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1372 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1423 | 1299 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 993 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Medium 3.5 better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mistral Medium 3.5 or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 35.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.