# Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

> Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct costs 2.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Medium 3.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-medium-3-5-vs-qwen2-5-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 39.1 to 16.2.
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is cheaper at $0.70 / $2.80 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.2 | 30.1 |
| Rank | 152 | 297 |
| Context | 262K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $1.50 | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | $7.50 | $2.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1264 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LMArena Coding | 1461 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.35 | 128.52 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 41.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 12.9% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1436 | — |

## Math

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1431 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1432 | — |

## Multimodal

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1223 | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1442 | — |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1451 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1385 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1409 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1415 | — |

## Long Context

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1374 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 993 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1423 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Medium 3.5 better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct costs 2.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Medium 3.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $2.80 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.5 lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

### Is Mistral Medium 3.5 or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Medium 3.5 does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.