# Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen-14B

> Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-medium-3-5-vs-qwen-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen-14B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 58.5 to 27.6.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.2 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 152 | 275 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $1.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $7.50 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213)
- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1461 | 1071 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1264 | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295)
- Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1436 | 1027 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.35 | 113.03 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 41.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 12.9% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |

## Math

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113)
- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1431 | 1068 |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1432 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |

## Multimodal

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1223 | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100)
- Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1442 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1451 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1385 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1409 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90)
- Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1415 | 1031 |

## Long Context

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103)
- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1028 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117)
- Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1421 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1374 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1423 | 1022 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 993 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Medium 3.5 better than Qwen-14B?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mistral Medium 3.5 or Qwen-14B better for coding?

Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen-14B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.