# Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-medium-3-5-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 51.9 to 38.1.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 40.2 | 37.9 |
| Rank | 152 | 191 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $1.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $7.50 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1461 | 1291 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1264 | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1436 | 1272 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 41.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 12.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.35 | — |

## Math

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1431 | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1432 | 1295 |

## Multimodal

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1223 | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1442 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | 1260 |
| LMArena German | 1451 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1409 | 1289 |
| LMArena Korean | 1385 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1415 | 1247 |

## Long Context

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1421 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1374 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1423 | 1252 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 993 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Medium 3.5 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mistral Medium 3.5 or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.5 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.