# Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3.7 Max

> Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.4 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Medium 3.1 costs 4.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-medium-3-1-vs-qwen3-7-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Mistral Medium 3.1 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 48.4 to 10.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 6.5% for Mistral Medium 3.1 and 85.1% for Qwen3.7 Max.
- Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper at $0.40 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3.7 Max.
- Qwen3.7 Max accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.5 | 51.4 |
| Rank | 260 | 35 |
| Context | 131K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.40 | $2.50 |
| Output $/M | $2 | $7.50 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Mistral Medium 3.1: —
- Qwen3.7 Max: 50.2 (#43)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 77.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1515 |
| SciCode | — | 48.8% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1498 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,189 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mistral Medium 3.1: —
- Qwen3.7 Max: 21.8 (#129)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | — | 0.4% |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.1 (#336)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 48.4 (#36)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 6.5% | 85.1% |
| SimpleBench | — | 70.4% |
| CritPt | — | 13.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 19% |
| Thematic Generalization | 20.3% | — |
| EBR-Bench | — | 9.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1483 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 32% |
| DTBench | — | 92.3% |
| LMCA | — | 44% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 153.74 |

## Math

- Mistral Medium 3.1: —
- Qwen3.7 Max: 62.3 (#26)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 26% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1488 |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Medium 3.1: —
- Qwen3.7 Max: 61.7 (#24)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 55.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1488 |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Medium 3.1: —
- Qwen3.7 Max: 57.1 (#13)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1475 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1533 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1482 |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Medium 3.1: —
- Qwen3.7 Max: 76.9 (#34)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1460 |

## Long Context

- Mistral Medium 3.1: —
- Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#34)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1484 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.6 (#140)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 65.2 (#52)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1450 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1476 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1110 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1482 |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.4 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Medium 3.1 costs 4.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Qwen3.7 Max?

Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max lists at $2.50 and $7.50.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Max does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.7 Max share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.