# Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen2-72B

> Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-medium-3-1-vs-qwen2-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.1 leads 55.6 to 41.0.
- Qwen2-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.5 | 29.5 |
| Rank | 260 | 294 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Output $/M | $2 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Medium 3.1: —
- Qwen2-72B: 28.7 (#303)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1196 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mistral Medium 3.1: —
- Qwen2-72B: 16.9 (#138)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.1 (#336)
- Qwen2-72B: 22.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 6.5% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 20.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1191 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.27 |

## Math

- Mistral Medium 3.1: —
- Qwen2-72B: 27.9 (#232)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1235 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.1% |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Medium 3.1: —
- Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#270)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1171 |
| MMLU | — | 82.4% |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Medium 3.1: —
- Qwen2-72B: 36.0 (#239)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1240 |
| LMArena French | — | 1169 |
| LMArena German | — | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1169 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1168 |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Medium 3.1: —
- Qwen2-72B: 62.0 (#236)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1181 |

## Long Context

- Mistral Medium 3.1: —
- Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#230)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1193 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.6 (#140)
- Qwen2-72B: 41.0 (#236)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1181 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1476 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1195 |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Qwen2-72B?

Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen2-72B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.