# Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Mistral Nemo

> Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 5.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Medium 3.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-medium-3-1-vs-mistral-nemo
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Mistral Medium 3.1 scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Nemo in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.1 leads 55.5 to 28.5.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2 for Mistral Medium 3.1.
- Mistral Medium 3.1 accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 26.4 |
| Rank | 266 | 337 |
| Context | 131K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.40 | $0.15 |
| Output $/M | $2 | $0.15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mistral Medium 3.1: —
- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341)
- Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 6.5% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 20.3% | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.68 |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |

## Math

- Mistral Medium 3.1: —
- Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Medium 3.1: —
- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145)
- Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)

| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1476 | 881 |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Mistral Nemo?

Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 5.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Medium 3.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Mistral Nemo?

Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.1 lists at $0.40 and $2.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Medium 3.1 does, with 131K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.1 and Mistral Nemo share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.