# Mistral Large vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B

> Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-large-vs-qwen3-5-35b-a3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 25

## Summary

- They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Large scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads 39.9 to 18.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 8.5% for Mistral Large and 70% for Qwen3.5 35B-A3B.
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is cheaper at $0.25 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Mistral Large.
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral Large | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 42.0 |
| Rank | 263 | 123 |
| Context | 131K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $2 | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | $6 | $2 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral Large: 34.3 (#240)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 33.8 (#251)

| Benchmark | Mistral Large | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 36.2% | 29.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1277 | 1410 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1254 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 30% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 38.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 264.7 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 62.2% | — |
| MBPP+ | 59.5% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mistral Large: 28.6 (#89)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: —

| Benchmark | Mistral Large | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 38.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral Large: 15.8 (#310)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 24.6 (#161)

| Benchmark | Mistral Large | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | 1400 |
| DTBench | 65.1% | 80% |
| LMCA | 16.7% | 29.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 128.52 | 142.52 |
| SimpleBench | 22.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 10% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 43.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 50.1% | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| LiveBench | 48.4% | — |

## Math

- Mistral Large: 18.2 (#291)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 39.9 (#97)

| Benchmark | Mistral Large | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 8.5% | 70% |
| LMArena Math | 1262 | 1404 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 56% |
| Omni-MATH | 28.1% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 42.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 50.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral Large: 30.1 (#230)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 47.8 (#79)

| Benchmark | Mistral Large | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 51.3% | 83.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 4.5% | 10.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1232 | 1408 |
| MMLU-Pro | 59.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 21.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 43.5% | — |
| MMLU | 80% | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral Large: 40.0 (#219)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 50.0 (#127)

| Benchmark | Mistral Large | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1237 | 1378 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1240 | 1457 |
| LMArena French | 1325 | 1412 |
| LMArena German | 1254 | 1367 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1188 | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | 1202 | 1356 |
| LMArena Russian | 1257 | 1376 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1268 | 1392 |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral Large: 67.9 (#191)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 72.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | Mistral Large | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1249 | 1379 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 67.9% | — |
| IFEval | 87.7% | — |

## Long Context

- Mistral Large: 38.3 (#199)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 42.4 (#127)

| Benchmark | Mistral Large | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1261 | 1389 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral Large: 40.7 (#242)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 57.9 (#124)

| Benchmark | Mistral Large | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1266 | 1395 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1243 | 1346 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1260 | 1390 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 69% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 985 | — |
| WildBench | 80.1% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 39.4% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral Large better than Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Mistral Large or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; Mistral Large lists at $2 and $6.

### Is Mistral Large or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (34.3 vs 33.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral Large and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B share?

25 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Large has 51 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has 28.