# Mistral 7B vs Qwen3.6 27B

> Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index. Mistral 7B costs 5.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.6 27B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-7b-vs-qwen3-6-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 5

## Summary

- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 27B in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 27B leads 52.4 to 7.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 0.3% for Mistral 7B and 91.1% for Qwen3.6 27B.
- Mistral 7B is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $3.60 for Qwen3.6 27B.
- Qwen3.6 27B accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 8K.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral 7B | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 23.0 | 42.2 |
| Rank | 351 | 117 |
| Context | 8K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | $0.25 | $3.60 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral 7B: 26.4 (#326)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 39.1 (#163)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 37.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 19.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1082 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 27.3% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 36% | — |
| MBPP+ | 42.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral 7B: 13.1 (#336)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 25.0 (#153)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 22% |
| DTBench | 42.5% | 78.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.21 | 146.5 |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1067 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| LMCA | — | 34.5% |
| Adversarial NLI | 47.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 56.1% | — |
| HellaSwag | 81% | — |
| PIQA | 83% | — |
| WinoGrande | 75.3% | — |

## Math

- Mistral 7B: 8.1 (#325)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 48.5 (#62)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.3% | 91.1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 35.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1085 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 3.7% | — |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral 7B: 7.4 (#311)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#63)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 15.2% | 85.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 87.4% | — |
| MMLU | 62.5% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 79.8% | — |
| TriviaQA | 75.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral 7B: 25.8 (#283)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1012 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1009 | — |
| LMArena French | 1037 | — |
| LMArena German | 987 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 878 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1018 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1026 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral 7B: 54.2 (#280)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1060 | — |

## Long Context

- Mistral 7B: 32.2 (#271)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1060 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral 7B: 30.7 (#286)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#181)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1090 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1068 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1026 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1062 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral 7B better than Qwen3.6 27B?

Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index. Mistral 7B costs 5.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.6 27B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Mistral 7B or Qwen3.6 27B?

Mistral 7B is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 27B lists at $0.60 and $3.60.

### Is Mistral 7B or Qwen3.6 27B better for coding?

Qwen3.6 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.6 27B does, with 262K tokens against 8K.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral 7B and Qwen3.6 27B share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral 7B has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 27B has 11.