# Mistral 7B vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

> Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 22.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-7b-vs-qwen3-5-max-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.1 to 30.9.
- Mistral 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral 7B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 22.9 | 44.7 |
| Rank | 346 | 72 |
| Context | 8K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.25 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Mistral 7B: 25.9 (#321)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 43.4 (#79)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1082 | 1488 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 19.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 27.3% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 36% | — |
| MBPP+ | 42.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral 7B: 12.6 (#331)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 29.6 (#81)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1067 | 1483 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 42.5% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 47.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 56.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.97 | — |
| HellaSwag | 81% | — |
| PIQA | 83% | — |
| WinoGrande | 75.3% | — |

## Math

- Mistral 7B: 7.6 (#319)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 37.3 (#99)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1085 | 1473 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 3.7% | — |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral 7B: 7.3 (#306)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.1 (#104)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | 1489 |
| GPQA Diamond | 15.2% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 87.4% | — |
| MMLU | 62.5% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 79.8% | — |
| TriviaQA | 75.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral 7B: 26.0 (#278)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.4 (#21)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1012 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1009 | 1534 |
| LMArena French | 1036 | 1483 |
| LMArena German | 987 | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | 878 | 1497 |
| LMArena Russian | 1018 | 1472 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1026 | 1470 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1438 |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral 7B: 54.5 (#275)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.2 (#28)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1060 | 1467 |

## Long Context

- Mistral 7B: 32.2 (#266)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#44)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1060 | 1477 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral 7B: 30.9 (#281)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.1 (#39)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1090 | 1471 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1068 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1062 | 1478 |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral 7B better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 22.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mistral 7B or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 25.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral 7B and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral 7B has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.