# Mistral 7B vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-7b-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 35.5 to 7.4.
- Mistral 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral 7B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 23.0 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 351 | 181 |
| Context | 8K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.25 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Mistral 7B: 26.4 (#326)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1082 | 1314 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 19.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 27.3% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 36% | — |
| MBPP+ | 42.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral 7B: 13.1 (#336)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1067 | 1299 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 42.5% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 47.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 56.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.21 | — |
| HellaSwag | 81% | — |
| PIQA | 83% | — |
| WinoGrande | 75.3% | — |

## Math

- Mistral 7B: 8.1 (#325)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1085 | 1298 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 3.7% | — |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral 7B: 7.4 (#311)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | 1289 |
| GPQA Diamond | 15.2% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 87.4% | — |
| MMLU | 62.5% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 79.8% | — |
| TriviaQA | 75.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral 7B: 25.8 (#283)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1012 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1009 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 987 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 878 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1018 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1037 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1026 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral 7B: 54.2 (#280)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1060 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Mistral 7B: 32.2 (#271)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1060 | 1292 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral 7B: 30.7 (#286)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1090 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1068 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1062 | 1299 |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral 7B better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mistral 7B or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral 7B and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral 7B has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.