# Mistral 7B vs Qwen1.5-110B

> Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.6 to 22.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-7b-vs-qwen1-5-110b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen1.5-110B leads 31.1 to 7.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 27.3% for Mistral 7B and 44.4% for Qwen1.5-110B.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral 7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 22.9 | 33.6 |
| Rank | 346 | 231 |
| Context | 8K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.25 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral 7B: 25.9 (#321)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 19.5% | 35% |
| LMArena Coding | 1082 | 1184 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 27.3% | 44.4% |
| HumanEval+ | 36% | — |
| MBPP+ | 42.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral 7B: 12.6 (#331)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1067 | 1168 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 42.5% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 47.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 56.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.97 | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
| HellaSwag | 81% | — |
| PIQA | 83% | — |
| WinoGrande | 75.3% | — |

## Math

- Mistral 7B: 7.6 (#319)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1085 | 1185 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 3.7% | — |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral 7B: 7.3 (#306)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | 1144 |
| GPQA Diamond | 15.2% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 87.4% | — |
| MMLU | 62.5% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 79.8% | — |
| TriviaQA | 75.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral 7B: 26.0 (#278)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1012 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1009 | 1206 |
| LMArena French | 1036 | 1150 |
| LMArena German | 987 | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | 878 | 1074 |
| LMArena Russian | 1018 | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1026 | 1141 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1044 |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral 7B: 54.5 (#275)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1060 | 1158 |

## Long Context

- Mistral 7B: 32.2 (#266)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1060 | 1157 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral 7B: 30.9 (#281)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1090 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1068 | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1062 | 1160 |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral 7B better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.6 to 22.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mistral 7B or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

Qwen1.5-110B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.4 versus 25.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral 7B and Qwen1.5-110B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral 7B has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.